1:35pm. Maybe I really do suffer from acute depression. I wept earlier about Dresden. The war was over by then. They were totally helpless. It was just pure cruelty. Women and children concentrated in a town as pretty as a postcard. Quaint old structures that caught on fire and burned their occupants alive. Totally unnecessary. All that innocent blood on our hands for nothing. It lets you know just how disastrous it is when power has no class. The main culprit for Dresden was bloody Bomber Harris of Bomber Command, I believe. He didn't receive any post-war commendations for his efforts like the other big generals, as you would expect of someone who has no class. Of course, it was too late for the poor Germans by then. That's really something to be ashamed of, the bombing of Dresden.
In that dream I was in that war and I crossed paths with my father as a youth on the battlefield. Well, we were both young, I guess. (It's seeming less and less likely to be accurate, as it grows in detail.) I got lucky. I got captured by the Germans and survived the war.
When they undergo these bombing campaigns, they don't let us see very much, do they? Maybe they know we wouldn't agree with it. They let you see one child amputee from a soft target in the Middle East and you're supposed to multiply it in your imagination if you want it to be accurate. And everything else is embedded reporting. Video games help make it look like a party.
I know why they need you to trust stars: because then you'll believe the stars when they lie to you on Pentagon owned networks during wars. It's ironic to me that we trust a star over a news reporter. The news reporter must have at least had an inkling towards telling the truth at some point in her career, while a lot of stars' truth came out of my blogs spanning the years 1999 to 2007. I can't imagine how much they hide from you. By my life alone, I can see it's a shitload.
Like I said, one of my co-tenants watches Family Guy a lot - which I thought was banned. I get along well with him and have told him about these TV stars robbing me. I was pleased that he believed me, but I'm afraid he shows me little or no sympathy. He thinks I'm at fault for being too naïve by trusting Google and the stars with my work. As it turns out, I was naïve; but am I really to blame for this awful crime against me? How many members does YouTube have? 500 million? And out of all those members, has anyone else had every song they shared there stolen and put on the radio? Why would I think I was different than anyone else? And I'm an artist. What am I supposed to do with my talent? Hide it? I don't think God would punish me for my innocence, my love, and my trust in my fellow man the way Family Guy viewers and Ellen fans seem to think I deserve. Obviously they've been morally corrupted on this affair by their continued attachment to these antediluvian TV shows that I could have replaced with innovative new shows by now if they hadn't stolen all my thousands of comedy posts for themselves.
It's my fault that they wouldn't let me develop new shows, but turned my work into old shows. It's my fault that they don't want to write a script because it's easier to talk. It's my fault that power is too afraid of good writers to let them on TV. It's my fault no one else in YouTube's community of 500 million wrote anything phenomenal so I wouldn't stand out too much. It's all my fault. Well, you'd be pleased to know that I've been punished and punished and punished for these crimes of mine.
Now, speaking of cartoons, there's this fool who keeps getting out of jail and stealing my music every year. I think it's whoever had that old song Respect, which has likely been erased since I complained about it yesterday. So, are you going to let him keep the other old songs he took from me, like Survival? Didn't you check his content against the below list of my 192 songs? Do I have to wait and be disturbed by someone taunting me with a phrase like 'you can't touch his survival' before he must erase my song? Does no one ever flag him when he gets out of jail and steals my music again? Is it supposed to disturb me again after twelve years of abuse? Isn't this abuse a little over the top for simply being naïve?
I can't tell you precisely who this offender is, but I can share his stupid thoughts with you. He sits and reads my blogs every day, and when I say something that looks unpopular he thinks, 'I have him now!' He has believed this each time, through as many as four incarcerations up to this point. He thinks, 'President Trump is helping those TV frauds, so President Trump will help me.' Those stars are Trump's friends from his own TV stardom back in the late 90's. Unlike this fool, who owed his entire fame to my music from 12 years ago, they were already established before I came along in '07. And here's a good one: he thinks, 'if at first you don't succeed, try, try again.' Someone has to explain to him that you can't apply noble determination to a dishonourable deed. It doesn't work. It's like saying, 'if I just keep trying, maybe I can burn down that daycare center and kill everyone inside!'
He steals my old songs for three reasons: they draw attention away from my newer, better sounding recordings; they are harder to find on my channel - especially when it's hacked; and, the most obvious reason of all, because he doesn't know how to write songs. If he knew how to write songs, he wouldn't bother with a boring old recording like Survival. Compare Flimsy to Survival. Why would I care about Survival when I have Flimsy? And you should hear how this new recording is turning out at home. It might even end up outmatching Flimsy in quality.
I've been hearing Dateline's name a lot in reference to this fool. Does anyone still remember Dateline accurately but me? Are you unable to access those blogs I wrote in Ottawa in 2013, while I was asking that lawyer with my evidence to bust these stars and broadcasters? Did you forget what I wrote in The Dirt on Dateline, or End of the Line, or Life After Dateline? Dateline's a good example of why broadcasters only want you to navigate the now; because it doesn't take much digging to see that their past reports contradict their present ones, indicating extreme lies. For instance, in 2010 they interviewed this evil band that stole my music in prison and totally destroyed their public image on my behalf. A few years later, after I rewrote a few hundred NBC crimes, they presented him in a more favourable light, I gather. What happened in between - besides my rediscovery of an offense against me that was so bad it put me on disability? Something to bring them together as comrades: incarceration and punishment.
Getting your information from these corrupt broadcasters who want you to live totally in the present is like being tied down to the floor of moving rail car and seeing the passing world outside through a pinhole. You see a tree one instant and they say 'that's all there is.' Then you see a field with no trees, and they say, 'that's all there is.' I hope you like that analogy. I owe it to Kurt Vonnegut from his comparison of Tralfamadorian perception to our own in his novel, Slaughterhouse Five. I credit my sources. I don't need to steal my cleverness from anyone else.
Now, what kind of solutions do we have for these repeat offenders? Obviously incarceration and the regular punishment aren't working. I think we should increase the severity of their punishment now. Use your imagination. And I challenge the crowd to rush the stage if he's performing and pull down his pants. See the mess that he and Dateline want to put on me with their hideous lies. If I'm wrong about it, you can come and sign my dick. If I'm right, well, you'll know what to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment